Currently Browsing: Cops Behaving Badly

UTAH: Just Say “No” To Drug Dogs.

A Federal Court has ruled that in the state of Utah, so called “alerts” by drug sniffing dogs are unreliable and cannot be used as a premise for a search of a car for drugs and anything else.

In the case of United States v. Jordan, the Court wrote:

Thus, the finding of probable cause here was based solely on Officer Moore’s subjective interpretation of what he believed Tank’s actions meant. Such a finding cannot be considered “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment, as the Supreme Court has long held that more than such “inarticulate hunches” are necessary in order to permit “intrusions upon constitutionally guaranteed rights,” recognizing that “[i]f subjective good faith alone were the test, the protections of the Fourth Amendment would evaporate, and the people would be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, only in the discretion of the police.” See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968) (quotations and citations omitted). Indeed, even in the Tenth Circuit, where alerts may be sufficient to support probable cause, a court must find an officer’s testimony that he believed his dog alerted to be credible in order to sustain a finding of probable cause. See Parada, 577 F.3d at 1281.

The issue in this case was the initial training and post certification training the dog received. In the case, a dog by the name of “Tank,” was trained to “find” drugs in cars, “alerting” to the alleged presence of drugs, thus allowing the police to search a vehicle at a traffic stop. This has been standard procedure for some time. Courts have generally allowed that the dogs are reliable or at least have a “good faith” exception that there might be drugs in the car. This practice was thwarted somewhat by a Supreme Court case called Rodiguez v. The United States. In that case, the Court said that at a traffic stop, the police could not detain a person longer than it took to complete the initial traffic stop. What the police were doing was to stop a person, work on the ticket or whatever, and then detain a person until a drug sniffing dog could be brought to the scene. The Supreme Court said once the reason for the initial stop was done, they police could not demand the person wait until the drug sniffing dog got there. The police had to cut the person loose. The police in many jurisdictions responded to the Rodiguez ruling by seeing a traffic infraction and then instead of pulling the car and driver over immediately, they tailed the car while radioing for a K-9 unit. When the police eventually pulled the driver over, the dog and handler were nearby thus allowing the dog to walk around the car while the initial reason for the stop was being completed.

Stormtrooper Attacked By Police.

This happened in Alberta, Canada, but it has to make people wonder what in the galaxy the cops were thinking.

Star Wars fans all over the world celebrated the series on May 4th (“May the fourth be with you”) on Monday. Because it’s a Star Wars-themed pizza joint, Coco Vanilla Galactic Cantina in Alberta took advantage of the occasion to drum up more takeout business by having an employee stand outside the restaurant dressed as an Imperial stormtrooper.

Then the police showed up.

Brevard County Sheriff’s Office Claims They Have To Do Whatever The County Commission(ers) Say. How Wrong Can They Be?

After our post on April 1, 2020 concerning the outrageous actions of County Commissioner Bryan Lober, Sheriff Wayne Ivey and an un-named Deputy Sheriff in removing one Robert Burns from a “press conference” / meeting, we received an emails from Burns forwarding both his complaint to the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office and the response from email from Brevard County Sheriff’s Office West Precinct Commander Bruce L. Barnett.

We want to make it clear that we are not fans of Burns and his tactics, but this goes beyond our mutual dislike for each other. If the Sheriff’s Office thinks they can trample on the rights of people with impunity, that affects us all.

First, the Burns’ complaint email dated March 28, 2020:

Lt Simpkins,

I’ve been trying to reach you to get more information and file a formal complaint about the incident that occurred this past Tuesday at the press conference.

According to Sgt Hammond your subordinate, he was instructed by you to have me removed from the county press conference at the request of Bryan Lober.

Brownback Vs. King.

In the summer of 2014, James King was on a break from school, working two jobs. As he was walking from one job to the other, he was stopped by two men. It is here that everything starts to go wrong.

On that fateful July day, a detective with the Grand Rapids Police Department and a special agent with the FBI approached King, mistaking him for a man wanted for breaking into the home of a former employer and stealing. According to King, they didn’t identify themselves but asked him questions, then pinned him against their SUV and took his wallet. King says he thought he was being mugged and attempted to run. The two officers then attacked King and beat him unconscious.

Bystanders who watched this happen also didn’t realize that King’s attackers were police. Some called the police and others filmed. When more police arrived, they ordered bystanders to delete video of the beating (some complied).

Rather than acknowledge they mistook King for someone else, police and prosecutors instead charged him with assaulting the police officers and resisting arrest. They tried to get him to accept a plea deal but King refused, forcing a trial and risking years in prison. While he was completely acquitted by a jury in 2015, the fight bankrupted his family.

King was taken to the hospital and handcuffed to the bed.

Cop Hoax.

(Screenshot via KSNT)

On December 28, 2019 a police officer from Herington, Kansas Police Department ordered a coffee from a local McDonald’s.

What happened next is appalling.

Herington Police Chief Brian Hornaday said on Saturday that a Herington Police officer went to the McDonald’s at 1127 South Washington Street on his way to work. He ordered a coffee and discovered that someone had written ‘f***ing pig’ on the side of it.

Hornaday said when the writing was brought to the attention of management at the McDonald’s, they offered the officer a free lunch.

In a statement, Chief Hornaday said the officer has worked in law enforcement for five years serving as a Military Police Officer in the United States Army. He’s worked at the Herington Police Department for only two months.

Our first reaction was “what is wrong with people? An officer wanted a coffee and someone decided to go the path of insulting him?”

We hoped the person who wrote the message would lose their position.

Cop Allegedly Fondles Dead Woman’s Breasts. There Is Good News Though.

“Hatred” by Italian painter Pietro Pajetta, 1896

An Los Angeles police officer has been suspended from the force after his body camera allegedly recorded him fondling the breasts of a dead woman.

A veteran Los Angeles police officer is under investigation after his body-worn camera captured him allegedly fondling a dead woman’s breasts.

The officer, who is assigned to downtown’s Central Division, was placed on leave once supervisors reviewed the footage during a random inspection, LAPD officials said.

When Seconds Matter, The Police Are 50 Minutes Away.

(Deanna Cook and Delvecchio Patrick)

This is a horrifying tale that illustrates the need for people to be able to defend themselves.

In 2012 32-year old single mother of two Deanna Cook called Dallas 911 due to the fact that her ex-husband Delvecchio Patrick was in her home and attacking her.

The relationship between Cook and Patrick can best be described as extremely violent.

Police and court records paint a grim picture of ever-increasing violence between Patrick and Cook.

In January 2009, Balch Springs police officers responded to a 911 call that he was holding Cook at knifepoint.

She told police that he kicked a bedroom door off its hinges, choked her and shoved her against a wall so hard that she started to black out. He picked up a knife and began yelling that he was going to “do it,” police records state.

Balch Springs officers arrested him. He was released on $25,000 bond the following month.

Accusations of violence surfaced again almost immediately.

Crossing Guard And Vet Had Weapons Confiscated For Criticizing Police.

Stephen Nichols is an 84 year old Korean War Veteran, a widower, and a retired law enforcement officer. He was also a crossing guard at the Tisbury School in Martha’s Vineyard.

Nichols had a concern with the schools resource officer, a police officer named Scott Ogden. Specifically, Nichols’ concern was that when kids were arriving at school, Odgen was away getting coffee.

The MV Times explains what happened:

Nichols said he was unimpressed with the Tisbury School resource officer’s alleged trips to Xtra Mart to get coffee when children came to school in the morning. While dining at Linda Jean’s a couple of weeks ago, Nichols said he told a friend about this and suggested somebody could “shoot up the school” in that officer’s absence, which he described as “leaving his post.”

Nichols said the waitress made a complaint to Tisbury Police about what she overheard and on the strength of that, [Police Chief] Saloio and another officer relieved Nichols of his crossing guard duties while he was in the midst of performing them and subsequently drove to his home and took away his firearms license and guns.

“He came up and told me what I said was a felony but he wasn’t going to charge me,” Nichols said of Saloio.

The confiscated guns were later turned over to Nichols’ son-in-law, Nichols told The Times.

Asked if he was given a letter or any paperwork for the seizure of his license, Nichols said,

“No he just told me to hand it over so I took it out of my wallet and handed it to him.”

Nichols said he has been licensed for firearms since 1958.

He said he didn’t receive any paperwork or receipts for the seizure of his guns, either.


« Previous Entries